I liked the Inpulse’s build quality, feet risers, mic, and aux inputs. I saw that it has more inputs/outputs and offers more features for the money. I ultimately went with the Hercules for my boy (16 y.o.) because it’s a bit larger, and he preferred the feel of its metal cased knobs and metal construction.
DJAY PRO VS REKORDBOX SOFTWARE
Hercules Inpulse 500 Pioneer DDJ-400 Software included DJuced Rekordbox Software compatible DJuced, Serato, Virtual DJ, Traktor, Djay Rekordbox Material Metal Plastic Pads RGB backlit Single-colored backlit Output RCA + 1/4 inch RCA Headphone jack 3.5mm + 1/4 inch 3.5mm Line input Yes No Deck-level VU meters 9 steps 5 steps Loop encoders Yes No Why Did I Choose Inpulse 500 Over DDJ-400 for My Son
DJAY PRO VS REKORDBOX DRIVERS
Rekordbox built-in ASIO engine avoids latency with the DDJ-400, but with other software such as VirtualDJ, Traktor, or Mixxx, the lack of ASIO drivers adds latency and trouble in WASAPI audio settings after Windows updates. Pioneer hasn’t got ASIO drivers for home controllers as DD-SB3 or 400. Hercules gives ASIO drivers for each controller with audio to decrease latency in Windows and protect users from Windows updates altering the audio (as disabling audio inputs when disabling Cortana / muting the 2nd output or virtualizing audio after games setup…). In contrast, Pioneer first controllers: SEP-C1 (released in 2008) / DDJ-S1 & T1 (2011) / DDJ-Ergo (2012), are not compatible with today’s macOS / See list of Pioneer DJ support in Catalina with the comment “Models that are not noted below are no longer supported.”
DJAY PRO VS REKORDBOX DRIVER
Hercules’s first DJ controllers (DJ Console Mk2 (released in 2005) / Rmx (2008) / 4-Mx (2011)…) still receive driver updates each year and then still run in today’s macOS. Hercules’ gear lifecycle is more lasting than Pioneer’s thanks to more prolonged driver support: They developed today’s controller format (2 decks, central mixer, 2 x stereo out with 1 for master, 1 for preview), so without Hercules, Pioneer fanboys may still use only CDJs. Hercules began computer DJing in 2003 when Pioneer had no interest in computer DJing. You may ask Pioneer fanboy which Hercules controllers he tried and if he ever touched the 500. “The only person more frustrating than a slanderer is one unwise enough to listen to him.” (Criss Jami “Killosophy”). You’ll notice that every year the company is becoming more innovative and releases some very nice equipment. Hercules is recognized in the DJ world as an entry-level brand. Why Hercules Is a Decent Competitor to Pioneer In this article, I’ll try to compare these two controllers objectively and hopefully help you decide between the two. However, both are excellent choices, and you can’t go wrong with either. But if you want a great build, a better beatmatch assistant, and a BPM tuner, opt for the Hercules Inpulse 500. If you’re looking for a more affordable controller and superior DJ software – Rekordbox DJ that you get for free, go for the DDJ-400. This is his first controller, he’s new to the DJing world, but it’s really great for him! The build quality is phenomenal, jog wheels are real big, and the performance pads have great tactility.īut which one is a better choice for you? Almost bought the DDJ-400 but ended up with the Hercules Inpulse 500. I did extensive research on this because I was buying one for my son.
Hercules is trying to be as beginner-friendly as possible: the Beatmatch Guide is a fantastic idea, and the DJ academy integrated into DJuced is a good starting point. Not only are they very affordable, but they are easy to use for those who want to get started and offer great sound quality. Two of the most common entry-level controllers in this industry are the Hercules Inpulse 500 and Pioneer DDJ 400.
This is a quite crowded market, and companies need to distinguish themselves from the competitors somehow. While I agree that Pioneer DJ is one of the biggest names on this market, I don’t necessarily agree they have the absolute best at beginner DJ controllers.Īnd I don’t say they are bad, far from it.
0 kommentar(er)
